Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
September 07, 2010, 08:26:09 AM
News: Scores from Linea de Fuego matches May be found at http://lineadefuego.info/scores/index.php

Pages: [1]
Print
Author Topic: Para 9mm double stack?  (Read 174 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Gregg
Unclassified
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 43


View Profile
« on: July 26, 2010, 05:49:28 PM »

Does anyone have and opinion,  or experience with a para 9mm double stack?  I think it is called an 18-9.
Logged
CDP45
Expert
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1045


Find yourself in a fair fight, your tactics suck.


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: July 26, 2010, 07:14:04 PM »

Lots of jaming problems out of the box.  Trigger pull is lousy.  Competent gunsmith (Will in Chino) can fix them up pertty good but cost $$$
Logged

I am ignoring you.  Why are you still talking?
Mossbergman
Sharpshooter
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 380



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: July 27, 2010, 06:40:12 AM »

I think Frank Perkins has one and had problems too. Can't remember exactly what, but got it fixed and seemed happy now.
Logged

Larry
www.pluspproficiency.com
"You never rise to the occasion, you only sink to your lowest level of training"- unknown
Brian
Administrator
Master
*****
Online Online

Posts: 3271



View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: July 27, 2010, 09:38:48 AM »

I think if you're going to put the money into a Para double stack (gun $$ + gunsmith $$) you'd be better off in .40 caliber - then you could shoot it Limited Major (and Limited-10 Major).
Logged

- Brian

"Get yourself a Glock and loose that nickel plated sissy pistol" - Tommy Lee Jones in US Marshals
Gregg
Unclassified
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 43


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: July 27, 2010, 07:07:38 PM »

Thanks for the reply guys.   I am interested in 9mm for lower recoil and cheaper reloading costs.  I already have my glock 21 for limited 10 major.  One or two other people have warned me about jamming.    Also why such a crappy trigger for a medium priced gun?
Logged
Mike S
Sharpshooter
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 338


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: July 27, 2010, 10:40:43 PM »

Quote
I am interested in 9mm for lower recoil and cheaper reloading costs
I don't think that loading for .40 costs much more than loading for 9mm.   I also don't think that the perceived recoil when shooting in a match is much different between 9mm and .40.   Are you sure that you want a 1911 style double stack?  You're shooting your Glock 21 really well; why not get a Glocl 34 or Glock 35 to shoot either limited minor or limited?

MIke
Logged
BlueOvalBruin
Global Moderator
Sharpshooter
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 953


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: July 28, 2010, 12:32:25 AM »

Mike's right about the recoil.  Plus, the lower recoil might make the gun feel sluggish to you.  I run my production loads up to about 145PF becuse it balances the gun better for me.  Since you like the large frame glocks you can do what Kelso did and buy a G20 and get a .40 barrel for it.  You can get mag extensions that hold 20 rounds and use it in Limited.  Or do what I did and get a G20 slide to put on your G21 frame.  Anyway, don't give up on the glock just yet, you've just touched the surface of what the platform can do.

One more thing about reloading cost.  Mike's right again, the cost difference is nil if you use about the same bullet weight.  Bullets are generally priced by weight so a 140gr RN .40 costs the same as a 147gr 9mm bullet.  The .40 load might even use less powder since the wider bullets tend to be more efficient (greater surface area for the gas pressure to act on).  180's of course will cost more than 140s but not by much.  Bear Creek 140s cost $46 per 1000 and 180's cost like $54-56 per 1000.
Logged

- Corey

"I was in Hillcrest the other day and went to an all you can eat sausage buffet..."
          -John Knoff, September 27th, 2009

Too tacticool for school
Gregg
Unclassified
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 43


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: July 28, 2010, 10:48:14 PM »

Thanks guys.  when i said reload cost and recoil,  I mean from .45 .    Now this G 20 has my interest.  Maybe a happy medium in .40 .   I could use heavy or light bullets to shoot minor or major. 
Logged
Brian
Administrator
Master
*****
Online Online

Posts: 3271



View Profile WWW
« Reply #8 on: July 29, 2010, 09:35:21 AM »

Thanks guys.  when i said reload cost and recoil,  I mean from .45 .    Now this G 20 has my interest.  Maybe a happy medium in .40 .   I could use heavy or light bullets to shoot minor or major. 

That' would probably be a real good frame size for you.
Logged

- Brian

"Get yourself a Glock and loose that nickel plated sissy pistol" - Tommy Lee Jones in US Marshals
Gregg
Unclassified
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 43


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: August 01, 2010, 08:49:45 AM »

I talked to a fellow at Pala with a Para 18-9.  He also had terrible extraction problems.  He said Pare refuses to admit there is a problem.  He had an aftermarket extractor modified and installed by a gunsmith.  He is now happy with it after trigger and other mods.     I will not buy one.  I like guns that work.  Thanks for the input guys. 
Logged
Pages: [1]
Print
Oceanside Pistol / Linea de Fuego Forum » Shooting Topics » The Pistol Side (Moderators: Robert, rkelso) » Topic: Para 9mm double stack?
Jump to:  



Login with username, password and session length

V e r d e » Design by Crip | Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC | Valid XHTML 1.0!